HANSAJI ALIAS HASMUKH ASHAJI LAXMANJI VANZARA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 400/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJGN010009242026

Filing Number

398/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

400/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

3-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191008240775

Police Station

CHANDKHEDA POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 103(2),109(1),118(1),118(2),189(4),190,191(3),351(3),296B,324(6),126(2),3(5),61(2)A,61(2)B
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HANSAJI ALIAS HASMUKH ASHAJI LAXMANJI VANZARA

    Adv. P M MAHETA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of CRMA No. 400/2026 The 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, dismissed the petitioner Hansaji (Hasmukh Ashaji) Vanzara's petition for release on regular bail. The court found that the accused faced serious charges including murder and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 103(2), 109(1), 118(1)-(2), 179(4), 190, 191(3), 351(3), 286(b), 324(6), 126(2), 3(5), 81(2)(s)-(b), and 135, relating to an alleged extrajudicial killing. Given the gravity of the charges supported by witness evidence and documentary proof including CCTV footage, the court held bail was neither appropriate nor just, citing precedent that in cases with serious allegations, bail cannot be granted when witnesses and evidence suggest the accused's involvement in grave crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 400/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRMA No. 400/2026 The 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, dismissed the petitioner Hansaji (Hasmukh Ashaji) Vanzara's petition for release on regular bail. The court found that the accused faced serious charges including murder and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 103(2), 109(1), 118(1)-(2), 179(4), 190, 191(3), 351(3), 286(b), 324(6), 126(2), 3(5), 81(2)(s)-(b), and 135, relating to an alleged extrajudicial killing. Given the gravity of the charges supported by witness evidence and documentary proof including CCTV footage, the court held bail was neither appropriate nor just, citing precedent that in cases with serious allegations, bail cannot be granted when witnesses and evidence suggest the accused's involvement in grave crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case