MONALIBEN VINODKUMAR PATEL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 394/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJGN010009022026
Filing Number
392/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
394/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11216011260138
Police Station
INFOCITY POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MONALIBEN VINODKUMAR PATEL
Adv. V J DAVE
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No. 394/2026 Court Decision: The 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, granted bail to petitioner Monaliben Vinodkumar Patel in a criminal matter involving charges under IPC Sections 316(5), 318(4), and 61(2), as well as Section 498A IPC. The court released her on regular bail of Rs. 25,000 with a surety bond of equal amount, finding the investigation complete and noting no criminal antecedents against her. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the accused had been falsely implicated in a property transaction scheme and that evidence did not substantiate the serious allegations. The court imposed standard bail conditions including regular court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and passport surrender, while noting that trial proceedings could proceed independently of bail status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA No. 394/2026 Court Decision: The 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, granted bail to petitioner Monaliben Vinodkumar Patel in a criminal matter involving charges under IPC Sections 316(5), 318(4), and 61(2), as well as Section 498A IPC. The court released her on regular bail of Rs. 25,000 with a surety bond of equal amount, finding the investigation complete and noting no criminal antecedents against her. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the accused had been falsely implicated in a property transaction scheme and that evidence did not substantiate the serious allegations. The court imposed standard bail conditions including regular court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and passport surrender, while noting that trial proceedings could proceed independently of bail status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts