PGVCL vs KASAMBHAI RANABHAI SAMA Advocate - EX — 95/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDW060014672024

Filing Number

95/2024

Filing Date

14-Oct-2024

Registration No

95/2024

Registration Date

14-Oct-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL

    Adv. M T NANAVATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASAMBHAI RANABHAI SAMA Advocate - EX

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 95/2024 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Kasambhai Ranabhai Sama for recovery of pending electricity bills. The court found the respondent liable for the outstanding amount of ₹5,395.90 and decreed recovery with 6% annual interest from the date the claim was filed until payment. However, the court rejected PGVCL's claim for 15% interest on the disputed charges, finding no contractual agreement between parties on this rate, and instead awarded the statutory 6% interest under applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 31-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 13-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 29-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 14-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 13-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 08-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 04-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 12-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 16-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 03-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 18-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 08-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 10-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 18-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 30-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 09-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 02-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 18-Nov-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 21-Oct-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 14-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 14-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 95/2024 The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Kasambhai Ranabhai Sama for recovery of pending electricity bills. The court found the respondent liable for the outstanding amount of ₹5,395.90 and decreed recovery with 6% annual interest from the date the claim was filed until payment. However, the court rejected PGVCL's claim for 15% interest on the disputed charges, finding no contractual agreement between parties on this rate, and instead awarded the statutory 6% interest under applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case