SHREE, DADUBHA HADABHA MANEK vs IKBALBHAI DAUDBHAI MUNERA Advocate - L M BAGTHARIA — 1763/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW050025862021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1763/2021
Filing Date
26-12-2021
Registration No
1763/2021
Registration Date
26-12-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, DWARKA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHREE, DADUBHA HADABHA MANEK
Adv. B.J.GOHEL
Respondent(s)
IKBALBHAI DAUDBHAI MUNERA Advocate - L M BAGTHARIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 31-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court of Dwarka convicted the accused Munera Iqbalbaī Daudbaī under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of ₹2,00,000 that was dishonored due to "Payment Stopped by Drawer" instruction. The court found that the complainant had lent money to the accused, who voluntarily signed and provided the cheque as security, and the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Act. The accused was sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of ₹4,00,000 (double the cheque amount) within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court of Dwarka convicted the accused Munera Iqbalbaī Daudbaī under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of ₹2,00,000 that was dishonored due to "Payment Stopped by Drawer" instruction. The court found that the complainant had lent money to the accused, who voluntarily signed and provided the cheque as security, and the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Act. The accused was sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of ₹4,00,000 (double the cheque amount) within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts