Government of Gujarat vs BHARATBHAI MADHABHAI DABHI Advocate - H J RATHOD — 1001/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 106(1),281,125(a),125(b). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW030011092025
Filing Number
1001/2025
Filing Date
21-07-2025
Registration No
1001/2025
Registration Date
21-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
50622
Police Station
KALYANPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHARATBHAI MADHABHAI DABHI Advocate - H J RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 08-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused (Bharatbhai Madhabhai Dabhi) of charges under IPC Sections 271, 105(1), 125(a), and 125(b) for an alleged electrocution death, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused's negligent or reckless conduct caused the victim's death, as no witness directly observed the accused's involvement and the circumstantial evidence was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused (Bharatbhai Madhabhai Dabhi) of charges under IPC Sections 271, 105(1), 125(a), and 125(b) for an alleged electrocution death, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused's negligent or reckless conduct caused the victim's death, as no witness directly observed the accused's involvement and the circumstantial evidence was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts