THA VALJI KHATAU vs Vijay Samatbhai Goriya Advocate - S I UDHEJA — 1/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Documentary Evidence. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

Documentary Evidence Next hearing 18-Apr-2026 this date has passed

TMSUIT - TRADE MARK SUIT

CNR: GJDW010009032024

Filing Number

1/2024

Filing Date

17-Dec-2024

Registration No

1/2024

Registration Date

17-Dec-2024

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

6-2nd Addl District Judge

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Copyright Act, 1957 Section 60
Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THA VALJI KHATAU

    Adv. R N SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Samatbhai Goriya Advocate - S I UDHEJA

Case History

  1. 18-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  3. 07-Feb-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 03-Jan-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 06-Dec-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 01-Nov-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 20-Sep-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 19-Jul-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 21-Jun-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 17-May-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  12. 19-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary Suit No. 1/2024 - Trademark Infringement Case Outcome: Suit allowed in plaintiff's favor; Defendant's use of confusingly similar mark restrained The plaintiff's claim for protection of the "Thakur Wali Khataun" trademark for pure ghee, used since 1936, was allowed. The court found the defendant's use of the identical/deceptively similar mark constitutes infringement and passing off, causing likelihood of customer confusion and damage to plaintiff's goodwill and reputation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 19-Apr-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  14. 16-Apr-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    2nd Addl District Judge

  15. 03-Apr-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    2nd Addl District Judge

  16. 29-Mar-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2nd Addl District Judge

  17. 15-Mar-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2nd Addl District Judge

  18. 27-Feb-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2nd Addl District Judge

  19. 20-Feb-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2nd Addl District Judge

  20. 05-Feb-2025

    For Rejoinder

    2nd Addl District Judge

  21. 28-Jan-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    2nd Addl District Judge

  22. 10-Jan-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    2nd Addl District Judge

  23. 03-Jan-2025

    Summons - Notice

    2nd Addl District Judge

  24. 17-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 17-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Suit No. 1/2024 - Trademark Infringement Case Outcome: Suit allowed in plaintiff's favor; Defendant's use of confusingly similar mark restrained The plaintiff's claim for protection of the "Thakur Wali Khataun" trademark for pure ghee, used since 1936, was allowed. The court found the defendant's use of the identical/deceptively similar mark constitutes infringement and passing off, causing likelihood of customer confusion and damage to plaintiff's goodwill and reputation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case