PRIYANKA TARANKUMAR CHAUHAN vs Government of Gujarat — 1220/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - J

CNR: GJDH020082472025

Filing Number

1220/2025

Filing Date

12-Dec-2025

Registration No

1220/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT DAHOD

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRIYANKA TARANKUMAR CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted the applicant's BNSS Section 497 application to release Rs. 3,05,604 seized in a cybercrime fraud case, ordering electronic transfer to the applicant's bank account subject to conditions including furnishing a 1.5x bond, proving ownership, and reimbursing double if ownership cannot be established. The order cited BNSS Section 503 and precedents allowing magistrates discretion to release seized property to entitled persons pending investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1220/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the applicant's BNSS Section 497 application to release Rs. 3,05,604 seized in a cybercrime fraud case, ordering electronic transfer to the applicant's bank account subject to conditions including furnishing a 1.5x bond, proving ownership, and reimbursing double if ownership cannot be established. The order cited BNSS Section 503 and precedents allowing magistrates discretion to release seized property to entitled persons pending investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case