Gurudeepsing Sandhu S/o Mejarsing Bishansing vs Sanjay Krushna Rav Advocate - B H JOSHI — 11/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151,001,002A. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDH020002302015

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

11/2015

Filing Date

13-05-2015

Registration No

11/2015

Registration Date

13-05-2015

Court

CIVIL COURT DAHOD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 151,001,002A
SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 031,034,038

Petitioner(s)

Gurudeepsing Sandhu S/o Mejarsing Bishansing

Adv. M A SHEKH

Balavendar Kaur D/o Mejarsing Bishansing Sandhu

Adv. M A SHEKH

Mahendrasing S/o Mejarsing Bishang Sandhu

Adv. M A SHEKH

No 1- 3 through Munaf Zahir Shekh

Adv. M A SHEKH

Respondent(s)

Sanjay Krushna Rav Advocate - B H JOSHI

Mukeshkumar Venilal Suratwala

Sub Ragistrar Shri, Dahod

The State Of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

06-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

23-01-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

06-12-2025

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

03-11-2025

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

15-09-2025

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

30-07-2016
ORDER
30-07-2016
ORDER
21-03-2017
ORDER
13-12-2018
ORDER
30-11-2017
ORDER
30-11-2017
ORDER
24-02-2023
ORDER
24-02-2023
ORDER
04-09-2023
ORDER

Summary: The suit filed by the plaintiff seeking cancellation of a sale deed and injunction in SP.C.S No.11/2015 has been dismissed for default. The court found that despite multiple adjournments and ample opportunities, the plaintiff failed to appear and produce evidence, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the 8+ year old matter. The order was pronounced on September 4, 2023, by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Dahod. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The suit filed by the plaintiff seeking cancellation of a sale deed and injunction in SP.C.S No.11/2015 has been dismissed for default. The court found that despite multiple adjournments and ample opportunities, the plaintiff failed to appear and produce evidence, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the 8+ year old matter. The order was pronounced on September 4, 2023, by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Dahod. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT DAHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case