VIJAYSINH LAXAMNBHAI SOLANKI vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 25/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJCU080002142026

Filing Number

25/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

Addl. Court,Bodeli

Judge

1-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11184007251565

Police Station

NASWADI POLICE STATION - CHHOTAUDEPUR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYSINH LAXAMNBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. A M LALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court granted the petition of Vijaysinh Laxamnbhai Solanki for release of his seized vehicle with suitable conditions, applying precedent principles established in similar cases. The court held that except for embargoes under Section 98 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, no legal bar prevented vehicle release, and directed the seized foreign liquor to remain in custody while returning the vehicle to its rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court granted the petition of Vijaysinh Laxamnbhai Solanki for release of his seized vehicle with suitable conditions, applying precedent principles established in similar cases. The court held that except for embargoes under Section 98 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, no legal bar prevented vehicle release, and directed the seized foreign liquor to remain in custody while returning the vehicle to its rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case