Government of Gujarat vs Anilbhai Viththalbhai Koli Advocate - R J RATHVA — 152/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJCU040001792025

Filing Number

152/2025

Filing Date

21-Jan-2025

Registration No

152/2025

Registration Date

21-Jan-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JETPUR PAVI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11184005240476

Police Station

KARALI POLICE STATION - CHHOTAUDEPUR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anilbhai Viththalbhai Koli Advocate - R J RATHVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Anilbhai Viththalbhai Koli Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Anilbhai Viththalbhai Koli) of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite testimony from a police witness. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution's evidence—consisting primarily of a single police officer's statement—was insufficient to establish the essential elements of the offense. The court noted that panchas (witnesses to the spot inspection) did not corroborate the complainant's case, no independent witnesses were examined, and no credible evidence demonstrated the accused drove recklessly or negligently. Applying criminal law principles requiring proof "beyond reasonable doubt," the court held the prosecution had not met this threshold, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 14-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 01-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 25-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 18-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 21-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 152/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Anilbhai Viththalbhai Koli Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Anilbhai Viththalbhai Koli) of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite testimony from a police witness. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution's evidence—consisting primarily of a single police officer's statement—was insufficient to establish the essential elements of the offense. The court noted that panchas (witnesses to the spot inspection) did not corroborate the complainant's case, no independent witnesses were examined, and no credible evidence demonstrated the accused drove recklessly or negligently. Applying criminal law principles requiring proof "beyond reasonable doubt," the court held the prosecution had not met this threshold, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case