The State of Gujarat vs HARDIKBHAI DHARMENDRABHAI DABASARA Advocate - A R CHAVDA — 395/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181(3), 177, 184. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT050006862025

Case disposed

Filing Number

395/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

395/2025

Registration Date

17-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190001250258

Police Station

BARVALA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,181(3), 177, 184
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

The State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HARDIKBHAI DHARMENDRABHAI DABASARA Advocate - A R CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-04-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

25-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

28-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Case No. 395/2025 Acquittal Decision The court acquitted the accused, Hardikbhai Dharmendrabhai Dabasara, of charges under the Motor Vehicles Act sections 185, 181(3), 177, 184 and Prohibition of Alcoholic Liquor Act section 66(1)(b), finding the prosecution's evidence procedurally defective and unreliable. Key Reasoning The court held that mandatory blood-testing protocols under Rule 4 of the Medical Examination Rules 1959 were violated—critically, no evidence established that alcohol was prevented from touching the syringe during collection, and the sample reached the testing officer after the legally required seven-day period. The court found independent witnesses and medical testimony unreliable, noting procedural gaps undermined the prosecution case irreparably, warranting acquittal under the benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Case No. 395/2025 Acquittal Decision The court acquitted the accused, Hardikbhai Dharmendrabhai Dabasara, of charges under the Motor Vehicles Act sections 185, 181(3), 177, 184 and Prohibition of Alcoholic Liquor Act section 66(1)(b), finding the prosecution's evidence procedurally defective and unreliable. Key Reasoning The court held that mandatory blood-testing protocols under Rule 4 of the Medical Examination Rules 1959 were violated—critically, no evidence established that alcohol was prevented from touching the syringe during collection, and the sample reached the testing officer after the legally required seven-day period. The court found independent witnesses and medical testimony unreliable, noting procedural gaps undermined the prosecution case irreparably, warranting acquittal under the benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case