The State of Gujarat vs HARDIKBHAI DHARMENDRABHAI DABASARA Advocate - A R CHAVDA — 395/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181(3), 177, 184. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT050006862025
Filing Number
395/2025
Filing Date
17-10-2025
Registration No
395/2025
Registration Date
17-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BARWALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190001250258
Police Station
BARVALA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HARDIKBHAI DHARMENDRABHAI DABASARA Advocate - A R CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Case No. 395/2025 Acquittal Decision The court acquitted the accused, Hardikbhai Dharmendrabhai Dabasara, of charges under the Motor Vehicles Act sections 185, 181(3), 177, 184 and Prohibition of Alcoholic Liquor Act section 66(1)(b), finding the prosecution's evidence procedurally defective and unreliable. Key Reasoning The court held that mandatory blood-testing protocols under Rule 4 of the Medical Examination Rules 1959 were violated—critically, no evidence established that alcohol was prevented from touching the syringe during collection, and the sample reached the testing officer after the legally required seven-day period. The court found independent witnesses and medical testimony unreliable, noting procedural gaps undermined the prosecution case irreparably, warranting acquittal under the benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case No. 395/2025 Acquittal Decision The court acquitted the accused, Hardikbhai Dharmendrabhai Dabasara, of charges under the Motor Vehicles Act sections 185, 181(3), 177, 184 and Prohibition of Alcoholic Liquor Act section 66(1)(b), finding the prosecution's evidence procedurally defective and unreliable. Key Reasoning The court held that mandatory blood-testing protocols under Rule 4 of the Medical Examination Rules 1959 were violated—critically, no evidence established that alcohol was prevented from touching the syringe during collection, and the sample reached the testing officer after the legally required seven-day period. The court found independent witnesses and medical testimony unreliable, noting procedural gaps undermined the prosecution case irreparably, warranting acquittal under the benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts