THE STATE OF GUJARAT SHREE H P MAKWANA vs AGRI BUSINESS CENTER BARWALA Advocate - P M RATHOD — 414/2023

Case under The Seeds Act, 1966 Section 19. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 04th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT050004982023

Case disposed

Filing Number

414/2023

Filing Date

04-08-2023

Registration No

414/2023

Registration Date

04-08-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

THE SEEDS ACT, 1966 Section 19

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT SHREE H P MAKWANA

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AGRI BUSINESS CENTER BARWALA Advocate - P M RATHOD

SHREE KISHORKUMAR VELJIBHAI DALASHANIYA C/O AGRI BUSINESS CENTER

Adv. P M RATHOD

MAHALAXMI ENTERPRICE

PARIKH RAMESHCHANDRA CHATRABHUJ

AJEET SEEDS PVT LTD

JAYDEEPBHAI AMRAJIBHAI PANDYA

Adv. P M RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

04-05-2026

Disposed

01-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

30-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

16-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Case No. 414/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused persons of charges under the Seeds Act, 1966. The petitioner (State of Gujarat represented by agricultural official H.P. Makwana) failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The defendants were charged with selling substandard cotton seeds and violating seed quality regulations, but critical procedural failures—including improper sample collection, failure to follow mandatory re-testing procedures, and depriving accused of statutory rights—rendered the prosecution fatally flawed and insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Case No. 414/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused persons of charges under the Seeds Act, 1966. The petitioner (State of Gujarat represented by agricultural official H.P. Makwana) failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The defendants were charged with selling substandard cotton seeds and violating seed quality regulations, but critical procedural failures—including improper sample collection, failure to follow mandatory re-testing procedures, and depriving accused of statutory rights—rendered the prosecution fatally flawed and insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BARWALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case