THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAJBHAI KANAIYALAL PATEL Advocate - P M RATHOD — 252/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT050002732024
Filing Number
252/2024
Filing Date
28-02-2024
Registration No
252/2024
Registration Date
28-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BARWALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190001230464
Police Station
BARVALA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAJBHAI KANAIYALAL PATEL Advocate - P M RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 17-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The State of Gujarat charged Rajbhai Kanaiyalal Patel under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 for allegedly operating an MG Hector vehicle (Registration GJ-18-BP-8941) recklessly on December 10, 2023, causing an accident that resulted in one death and injuries to multiple persons. The court acquitted the accused, finding that the prosecution failed to establish rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt, as the accident's exact circumstances and the accused's conduct lacked sufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The State of Gujarat charged Rajbhai Kanaiyalal Patel under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 for allegedly operating an MG Hector vehicle (Registration GJ-18-BP-8941) recklessly on December 10, 2023, causing an accident that resulted in one death and injuries to multiple persons. The court acquitted the accused, finding that the prosecution failed to establish rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt, as the accident's exact circumstances and the accused's conduct lacked sufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts