Government of Gujarat vs MAHENDRABHA AMKUBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V K SODHATAR — 1133/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT030032282019

Filing Number

1133/2019

Filing Date

27-Sep-2019

Registration No

1133/2019

Registration Date

27-Sep-2019

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

200

Police Station

GADHADA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114
Police Act, 1949 Section 135
Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRABHA AMKUBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V K SODHATAR

  2. 2.MANGULUBHAI DADUBHAI KACHAR

    Adv. B H CHHATRAVALA

  3. 3.JAYRAJBHAI PiTHUBHAI

    Adv. B H CHHATRAVALA

  4. 4.jAYRAJBHAI KATHUBHAI GOVALIYA

    Adv. B H CHHATRAVALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Mahendrabha Amkubhai Khachar & Others (2019) Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, 506(2), 114, and Arms Act Section 25(1)(B)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite prosecution witnesses testifying about alleged assault and intimidation during a construction site dispute, the complainant failed to provide consistent and corroborating evidence. Critical witnesses either contradicted prosecution claims during cross-examination or provided vague testimony. The court emphasized that specific abusive words, concrete threats, and direct evidence of assault were not established on record—requirements essential for conviction under these sections. Citing precedent judgments, the court noted that quality of evidence matters more than quantity, and conviction cannot rest on weak or inconsistent witness accounts alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 29-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 02-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 27-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 05-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 17-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 11-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 30-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 03-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 28-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 25-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 27-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 30-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 26-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 20-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 22-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 11-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 22-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 19-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 07-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 13-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 02-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 16-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 25-Apr-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 18-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 10-Dec-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 23-Sep-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 27-Jul-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 01-Jun-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 07-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 02-Feb-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 02-Dec-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 23-Sep-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 22-Jul-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 07-May-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 18-Mar-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 04-Feb-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 24-Dec-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 19-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  68. 27-Sep-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1133/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Mahendrabha Amkubhai Khachar & Others (2019) Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, 506(2), 114, and Arms Act Section 25(1)(B)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite prosecution witnesses testifying about alleged assault and intimidation during a construction site dispute, the complainant failed to provide consistent and corroborating evidence. Critical witnesses either contradicted prosecution claims during cross-examination or provided vague testimony. The court emphasized that specific abusive words, concrete threats, and direct evidence of assault were not established on record—requirements essential for conviction under these sections. Citing precedent judgments, the court noted that quality of evidence matters more than quantity, and conviction cannot rest on weak or inconsistent witness accounts alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case