Government of Gujarat vs MAHENDRABHA AMKUBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V K SODHATAR — 1133/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030032282019
Filing Number
1133/2019
Filing Date
27-09-2019
Registration No
1133/2019
Registration Date
27-09-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
200
Police Station
GADHADA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MAHENDRABHA AMKUBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V K SODHATAR
MANGULUBHAI DADUBHAI KACHAR
Adv. B H CHHATRAVALA
JAYRAJBHAI PiTHUBHAI
Adv. B H CHHATRAVALA
jAYRAJBHAI KATHUBHAI GOVALIYA
Adv. B H CHHATRAVALA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Mahendrabha Amkubhai Khachar & Others (2019) Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, 506(2), 114, and Arms Act Section 25(1)(B)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite prosecution witnesses testifying about alleged assault and intimidation during a construction site dispute, the complainant failed to provide consistent and corroborating evidence. Critical witnesses either contradicted prosecution claims during cross-examination or provided vague testimony. The court emphasized that specific abusive words, concrete threats, and direct evidence of assault were not established on record—requirements essential for conviction under these sections. Citing precedent judgments, the court noted that quality of evidence matters more than quantity, and conviction cannot rest on weak or inconsistent witness accounts alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Mahendrabha Amkubhai Khachar & Others (2019) Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, 506(2), 114, and Arms Act Section 25(1)(B)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite prosecution witnesses testifying about alleged assault and intimidation during a construction site dispute, the complainant failed to provide consistent and corroborating evidence. Critical witnesses either contradicted prosecution claims during cross-examination or provided vague testimony. The court emphasized that specific abusive words, concrete threats, and direct evidence of assault were not established on record—requirements essential for conviction under these sections. Citing precedent judgments, the court noted that quality of evidence matters more than quantity, and conviction cannot rest on weak or inconsistent witness accounts alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts