BHARATBHAI RANCHODBHAI SORATHIYA(S.B.I. FIN.PROPARAYT vs SUNILBHAI SHIVRAMBHAI ROKIYA Advocate - D A MALVANIYA — 686/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 14th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT030011882024

Case disposed

Filing Number

686/2024

Filing Date

16-03-2024

Registration No

686/2024

Registration Date

16-03-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

BHARATBHAI RANCHODBHAI SORATHIYA(S.B.I. FIN.PROPARAYT

Adv. D Y DAVE

Respondent(s)

SUNILBHAI SHIVRAMBHAI ROKIYA Advocate - D A MALVANIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-05-2026

Disposed

08-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

16-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

02-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 686/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Sunil Shivram Rokiya under the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a check worth ₹60,000. The court found that the respondent fraudulently obtained the check from the complainant (petitioner/financial company) by misrepresenting loan details, failed to honor it despite timely notice, and made false claims about proprietary interests. Respondent sentenced to one year imprisonment under NI Act Section 138 with fine/alternate imprisonment, plus additional penalties. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the respondent's defense claims about insufficient funds and lack of proper check custody. Evidence showed the check was presented within validity period but dishonored due to inadequate balance—a direct violation of the NI Act's presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 686/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Sunil Shivram Rokiya under the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a check worth ₹60,000. The court found that the respondent fraudulently obtained the check from the complainant (petitioner/financial company) by misrepresenting loan details, failed to honor it despite timely notice, and made false claims about proprietary interests. Respondent sentenced to one year imprisonment under NI Act Section 138 with fine/alternate imprisonment, plus additional penalties. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the respondent's defense claims about insufficient funds and lack of proper check custody. Evidence showed the check was presented within validity period but dishonored due to inadequate balance—a direct violation of the NI Act's presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case