BHARATBHAI RANCHODBHAI SORATHIYA(S.B.I. FIN.PROPARAYT vs SUNILBHAI SHIVRAMBHAI ROKIYA Advocate - D A MALVANIYA — 686/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 14th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030011882024
Filing Number
686/2024
Filing Date
16-Mar-2024
Registration No
686/2024
Registration Date
16-Mar-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARATBHAI RANCHODBHAI SORATHIYA(S.B.I. FIN.PROPARAYT
Adv. D Y DAVE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUNILBHAI SHIVRAMBHAI ROKIYA Advocate - D A MALVANIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 686/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Sunil Shivram Rokiya under the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a check worth ₹60,000. The court found that the respondent fraudulently obtained the check from the complainant (petitioner/financial company) by misrepresenting loan details, failed to honor it despite timely notice, and made false claims about proprietary interests. Respondent sentenced to one year imprisonment under NI Act Section 138 with fine/alternate imprisonment, plus additional penalties. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the respondent's defense claims about insufficient funds and lack of proper check custody. Evidence showed the check was presented within validity period but dishonored due to inadequate balance—a direct violation of the NI Act's presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-May-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 686/2024
Case Summary: 686/2024 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Sunil Shivram Rokiya under the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a check worth ₹60,000. The court found that the respondent fraudulently obtained the check from the complainant (petitioner/financial company) by misrepresenting loan details, failed to honor it despite timely notice, and made false claims about proprietary interests. Respondent sentenced to one year imprisonment under NI Act Section 138 with fine/alternate imprisonment, plus additional penalties. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the respondent's defense claims about insufficient funds and lack of proper check custody. Evidence showed the check was presented within validity period but dishonored due to inadequate balance—a direct violation of the NI Act's presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts