INDUBEN D.o PARSHOTAMBHAI KHODABHAI VISANI W.o VINODBHAI LAKHTARIYA vs MAGANBBHAI PARSHOTAMBHAI VISANI Advocate - EX PARTY — 105/2017

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT030011472017

HEARING

Next Hearing

17th July 2026

Filing Number

105/2017

Filing Date

21-07-2017

Registration No

105/2017

Registration Date

21-07-2017

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 034

Petitioner(s)

INDUBEN D.o PARSHOTAMBHAI KHODABHAI VISANI W.o VINODBHAI LAKHTARIYA

Adv. D.A.MALVANIYA

Respondent(s)

MAGANBBHAI PARSHOTAMBHAI VISANI Advocate - EX PARTY

KANUBHAI PARSHOTAMBHAI VISANI

Adv. V.M.KHACHAR

LALITABEN PARSHOTAMBHAI VISANI

Adv. EX PARTY

HEMENDRABHAI MANOJBHAI VAKANI AS HAIR OF LATE MADHUBEN PARSHOTAMBHAI

JIGNESHBHAI MANOJBHAI VAKANI AS HEIR OF LATE MADHUBEN PARSHOTAMBHAI VISANI

TUSHARBHAI MANOJBHAI VAKANI AS HEIR OF LATE MADHUBEN PARSHOTAMBHAI VISANI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

26-05-2026

HEARING

27-04-2026

HEARING

27-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

23-02-2026

HEARING

Interim Orders

29-05-2023
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: R.C.S.105/2017 Parties: Induben (Petitioner) vs. Maganbbhai Parshotambhai Visani and others (Respondents) Court: High Court of Gujarat Key Issue: Partition of agricultural land and distribution of ancestral property among heirs according to Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court ordered that: 1. The petitioner is entitled to a 1/5 share in the joint agricultural land and three buildings located in Bhandariya village 2. The collector shall partition the property and allocate the petitioner's 1/6 share in the three residential structures 3. All respondents are co-heirs entitled to equal shares in the ancestral property 4. The court rejected claims of oral partition without registered deeds, emphasizing statutory recognized modes of partition per Hindu Succession Act and Registration Act, 1908 5. Court commissioner appointed to oversee property partition within 60 days with necessary demarcation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S.105/2017 Parties: Induben (Petitioner) vs. Maganbbhai Parshotambhai Visani and others (Respondents) Court: High Court of Gujarat Key Issue: Partition of agricultural land and distribution of ancestral property among heirs according to Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court ordered that: 1. The petitioner is entitled to a 1/5 share in the joint agricultural land and three buildings located in Bhandariya village 2. The collector shall partition the property and allocate the petitioner's 1/6 share in the three residential structures 3. All respondents are co-heirs entitled to equal shares in the ancestral property 4. The court rejected claims of oral partition without registered deeds, emphasizing statutory recognized modes of partition per Hindu Succession Act and Registration Act, 1908 5. Court commissioner appointed to oversee property partition within 60 days with necessary demarcation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case