THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs INDRAJITBHAI RAJUBHAI DHADHAL Advocate - V K SODHATAR — 130/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506(2),507. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030001672023
Filing Number
130/2023
Filing Date
30-01-2023
Registration No
130/2023
Registration Date
30-01-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190004221425
Police Station
GADHADA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
INDRAJITBHAI RAJUBHAI DHADHAL Advocate - V K SODHATAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 130/2023 - The State of Gujarat v. Indrajitbhai Rajubhai Dhadhal The Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Indrajitbhai Rajubhai Dhadhal of assault charges under IPC Sections 324, 504, and 506(2), sentencing him to one year imprisonment and fine after finding the victim's credible testimony corroborated by medical evidence and multiple witness accounts. The court rejected the accused's contradictory defense, noting consistency between ocular and medical evidence despite minor discrepancies in witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 130/2023 - The State of Gujarat v. Indrajitbhai Rajubhai Dhadhal The Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Indrajitbhai Rajubhai Dhadhal of assault charges under IPC Sections 324, 504, and 506(2), sentencing him to one year imprisonment and fine after finding the victim's credible testimony corroborated by medical evidence and multiple witness accounts. The court rejected the accused's contradictory defense, noting consistency between ocular and medical evidence despite minor discrepancies in witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts