LALITBHAI GANESHBHAI DABHI vs BIPINCHANDRA DHANJIBHAI SHAH Advocate - R.C.PRAJAPATI1. — 598/2019
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Section 13. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020030292019
Filing Number
598/2019
Filing Date
20-06-2019
Registration No
598/2019
Registration Date
20-06-2019
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LALITBHAI GANESHBHAI DABHI
Adv. K.H.BHADIYADRA
Respondent(s)
BIPINCHANDRA DHANJIBHAI SHAH Advocate - R.C.PRAJAPATI1.
DHARMENDRABHAI BIPINBHAI SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 598/2019 - Lalitbhai Ganeshbhai Dabhi vs. Bipinchandra Dhanjibhai Shah The court rejected the plaintiff's petition seeking vacant possession of rental property. The plaintiff failed to prove the defendants were in rent arrears for six months or that proper notice was served under the Rent Act. The court found the defendants held legal tenancy rights and dismissed all claims for eviction on grounds of unauthorized occupation, illegal construction, and bonafide requirements. Counter-claim also dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 598/2019 - Lalitbhai Ganeshbhai Dabhi vs. Bipinchandra Dhanjibhai Shah The court rejected the plaintiff's petition seeking vacant possession of rental property. The plaintiff failed to prove the defendants were in rent arrears for six months or that proper notice was served under the Rent Act. The court found the defendants held legal tenancy rights and dismissed all claims for eviction on grounds of unauthorized occupation, illegal construction, and bonafide requirements. Counter-claim also dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts