THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KARSHANBHAI OGHADBHAI BHEDA Advocate - R G GOHIL — 169/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,116B,98(2),81. Status: Evidence Of Prosecution. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Evidence Of Prosecution Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN090001992025

e-Filing Number

23-04-2025

Filing Number

169/2025

Filing Date

23-Apr-2025

Registration No

169/2025

Registration Date

23-Apr-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMRALA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198059250011

Police Station

UMRALA POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,116B,98(2),81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARSHANBHAI OGHADBHAI BHEDA Advocate - R G GOHIL

  2. 2.RAHULBHAI BHUPATBHAI DER

    Adv. R G GOHIL

  3. 3.JANAKGIRI MANGIRI GAUSWAMI

    Adv. Y M GOSWAMI

  4. 4.SUBHASHBHAI KALABHAI DANGAR

    Adv. R G GOHIL

  5. 5.MADHUBHAI HATHIBHAI GOVALIYA

    Adv. R G GOHIL

  6. 6.VITHTHALBHAI SAVSHIBHAI CHAVDA

    Adv. Y M GOSWAMI

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 30-Oct-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 14-Oct-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 30-Sep-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 29-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case CC/169/2025 Outcome: The court discharged Respondent No. 3 (the accused) from the case under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition filed by the State of Gujarat was dismissed. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case with grave suspicion against the accused. While the evidence created some suspicion, it did not meet the threshold required for framing charges. The court applied the settled legal principle that mere suspicion is insufficient; a prima facie case requires grave suspicion that has not been properly explained by the accused's defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 29-Aug-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 18-Aug-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 04-Aug-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 03-Jul-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 05-Jun-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 27-May-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 15-May-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 05-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 23-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 23-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case CC/169/2025 Outcome: The court discharged Respondent No. 3 (the accused) from the case under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition filed by the State of Gujarat was dismissed. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case with grave suspicion against the accused. While the evidence created some suspicion, it did not meet the threshold required for framing charges. The court applied the settled legal principle that mere suspicion is insufficient; a prima facie case requires grave suspicion that has not been properly explained by the accused's defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case