POPATBHAI KARSHANBHAI VIRASH vs RAMESHBHAI BECHARBHAI SARVAIYA Advocate - R B GOHIL — 1096/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBN070026382024
Filing Number
1096/2024
Filing Date
22-08-2024
Registration No
1096/2024
Registration Date
22-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALITANA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
POPATBHAI KARSHANBHAI VIRASH
Adv. J M GOHIL
Respondent(s)
RAMESHBHAI BECHARBHAI SARVAIYA Advocate - R B GOHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 30-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
| 25-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1096/2024 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pailitana, allowed the accused Rameshbhai Becharbhai Sarvaiya's application for compounding of the cheque bounce offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The accused had deposited the full cheque amount of Rs. 1,00,000 (one lakh rupees) in court before recording his defense evidence, and the complainant accepted the payment. Applying Supreme Court guidelines, the court permitted compounding without imposing any cost or penalty on the accused. The complainant was ordered to withdraw the deposited amount within 30 days, with liability for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1096/2024 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pailitana, allowed the accused Rameshbhai Becharbhai Sarvaiya's application for compounding of the cheque bounce offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The accused had deposited the full cheque amount of Rs. 1,00,000 (one lakh rupees) in court before recording his defense evidence, and the complainant accepted the payment. Applying Supreme Court guidelines, the court permitted compounding without imposing any cost or penalty on the accused. The complainant was ordered to withdraw the deposited amount within 30 days, with liability for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts