POPATBHAI KARSHANBHAI VIRASH vs RAMESHBHAI BECHARBHAI SARVAIYA Advocate - R B GOHIL — 1096/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 08th April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN070026382024

Filing Number

1096/2024

Filing Date

22-Aug-2024

Registration No

1096/2024

Registration Date

22-Aug-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALITANA

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POPATBHAI KARSHANBHAI VIRASH

    Adv. J M GOHIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI BECHARBHAI SARVAIYA Advocate - R B GOHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 1096/2024 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pailitana, allowed the accused Rameshbhai Becharbhai Sarvaiya's application for compounding of the cheque bounce offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The accused had deposited the full cheque amount of Rs. 1,00,000 (one lakh rupees) in court before recording his defense evidence, and the complainant accepted the payment. Applying Supreme Court guidelines, the court permitted compounding without imposing any cost or penalty on the accused. The complainant was ordered to withdraw the deposited amount within 30 days, with liability for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 11-Aug-2025

    Cross Examination

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 23-Jul-2025

    Cross Examination

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 11-Jun-2025

    Cross Examination

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 07-May-2025

    Cross Examination

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 29-Mar-2025

    Cross Examination

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 15-Feb-2025

    Cross Examination

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 04-Dec-2024

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 06-Nov-2024

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 26-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 22-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 22-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1096/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1096/2024 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pailitana, allowed the accused Rameshbhai Becharbhai Sarvaiya's application for compounding of the cheque bounce offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The accused had deposited the full cheque amount of Rs. 1,00,000 (one lakh rupees) in court before recording his defense evidence, and the complainant accepted the payment. Applying Supreme Court guidelines, the court permitted compounding without imposing any cost or penalty on the accused. The complainant was ordered to withdraw the deposited amount within 30 days, with liability for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case