UMESHBHAI RUDABHAI SANGA vs MANGALSIKKA REKHABEN ASHOKBHAI PROP. OF RAJKHODAL PETROLIUM Advocate - D N GHATAD — 11590/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBN020153432023

Filing Number

11590/2023

Filing Date

03-Oct-2023

Registration No

11590/2023

Registration Date

03-Oct-2023

Court

CIVIL COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESHBHAI RUDABHAI SANGA

    Adv. S M RADHANPURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANGALSIKKA REKHABEN ASHOKBHAI PROP. OF RAJKHODAL PETROLIUM Advocate - D N GHATAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 11590/2023 Court Decision: The court convicted the respondent (Mangalsikka Rekhaben Ashokbhai, proprietor of Raj Khodal Petroleum) under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, finding that the petitioner (Umeshbhai Rudabhai Sanga) proved that a cheque worth Rs. 5,00,000 issued by the respondent was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and proper notice was served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 09-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 09-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 10-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  25. 16-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  26. 22-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  27. 05-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  28. 27-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  29. 06-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  30. 06-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 03-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11590/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 11590/2023 Court Decision: The court convicted the respondent (Mangalsikka Rekhaben Ashokbhai, proprietor of Raj Khodal Petroleum) under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, finding that the petitioner (Umeshbhai Rudabhai Sanga) proved that a cheque worth Rs. 5,00,000 issued by the respondent was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and proper notice was served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case