KAMLESHBHAI KHIMAJIBHAI BARAIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH DGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - APP — 95/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th April 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBN010021842025

Case disposed

Filing Number

95/2025

Filing Date

03-05-2025

Registration No

95/2025

Registration Date

03-05-2025

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 374(3)
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

KAMLESHBHAI KHIMAJIBHAI BARAIYA

Adv. K A VYAS

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH DGP BHAVNAGAR Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

HARDEVSINH JETHUBHA GOHIL

Adv. P P JADEJA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

30-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

02-04-2026

FINAL HEARING

13-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

27-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 95-2025 Kamleshbhai Khimajibhai Baraiya v. State of Gujarat & Hardevsinh Jethubha Gohil Court Decision The appellate court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's conviction, finding that the accused (Kamleshbhai) committed an offense under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (cheque dishonor case). The accused was sentenced to six months imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 1,50,000, with the amount to be paid as compensation to the complainant, or two additional months imprisonment in default. Key Reasoning The court found that the accused issued a check for Rs. 1,50,000 to settle a legitimate debt/liability to the complainant (restaurant owner Hardevsinh Gohil). The check was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The trial court properly applied statutory presumptions under Sections 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the accused failed to produce credible evidence rebutting the presumption of a lawful debt. The evidence—including the check itself, bank return memo, and demand notice—established all elements of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 95-2025 Kamleshbhai Khimajibhai Baraiya v. State of Gujarat & Hardevsinh Jethubha Gohil Court Decision The appellate court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's conviction, finding that the accused (Kamleshbhai) committed an offense under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (cheque dishonor case). The accused was sentenced to six months imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 1,50,000, with the amount to be paid as compensation to the complainant, or two additional months imprisonment in default. Key Reasoning The court found that the accused issued a check for Rs. 1,50,000 to settle a legitimate debt/liability to the complainant (restaurant owner Hardevsinh Gohil). The check was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The trial court properly applied statutory presumptions under Sections 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the accused failed to produce credible evidence rebutting the presumption of a lawful debt. The evidence—including the check itself, bank return memo, and demand notice—established all elements of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case