JOMAN C JAMES vs NIDHI TRAVELS THROUGH SHILPABEN UMESHBHAI OZA Advocate - D M DABHI — 45/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJBN010005272026
Filing Number
45/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
45/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JOMAN C JAMES
Adv. Y J PATADIYA
Respondent(s)
NIDHI TRAVELS THROUGH SHILPABEN UMESHBHAI OZA Advocate - D M DABHI
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH DGP BHAVNAGAR
Adv. APP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Criminal Appeal 45-2026 The Bhavnagar Session Court upheld the conviction of appellant Joman C James under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, finding him guilty of issuing a cheque (No. 000004) for Rs. 6,69,575 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and ordered payment of Rs. 6,70,000 as compensation to complainant Nidhi Travels, with an additional two months imprisonment if the fine remained unpaid. The court rejected the appellant's defense that no legally enforceable debt existed, finding that the complainant had adequately proven the cheque was issued to discharge a legitimate financial obligation for tourism booking services, and that the appellant failed to present any credible rebuttal evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Criminal Appeal 45-2026 The Bhavnagar Session Court upheld the conviction of appellant Joman C James under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, finding him guilty of issuing a cheque (No. 000004) for Rs. 6,69,575 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and ordered payment of Rs. 6,70,000 as compensation to complainant Nidhi Travels, with an additional two months imprisonment if the fine remained unpaid. The court rejected the appellant's defense that no legally enforceable debt existed, finding that the complainant had adequately proven the cheque was issued to discharge a legitimate financial obligation for tourism booking services, and that the appellant failed to present any credible rebuttal evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts