ASMABEN WIFE OF IMRANBHAI AMINBHAI KURESHI vs SAMIR ALIAS SHAMBHO MIRUBHAI SUMRA — 115/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th April 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBN010002012026

Case disposed

Filing Number

115/2026

Filing Date

19-01-2026

Registration No

115/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR

Judge

2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11198015231401

Police Station

BOR TALAV POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439(2)
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376(2)(n),506(2),114

Petitioner(s)

ASMABEN WIFE OF IMRANBHAI AMINBHAI KURESHI

Adv. B M GAUSWAMI

Respondent(s)

SAMIR ALIAS SHAMBHO MIRUBHAI SUMRA

STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR

Adv. AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

16-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

ORDER

07-04-2026

ORDER

03-04-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CRMA/115/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the bail cancellation petition filed against accused Asmaben. Finding no cogent or overwhelming circumstances on record to justify cancellation of previously granted bail, the court held that bail once granted should not be mechanically cancelled without demonstrating supervening events that render it detrimental to fair trial. The court emphasized that personal liberty cannot be jeopardized routinely and noted the state failed to prove the accused misused her liberty or posed a flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA/115/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the bail cancellation petition filed against accused Asmaben. Finding no cogent or overwhelming circumstances on record to justify cancellation of previously granted bail, the court held that bail once granted should not be mechanically cancelled without demonstrating supervening events that render it detrimental to fair trial. The court emphasized that personal liberty cannot be jeopardized routinely and noted the state failed to prove the accused misused her liberty or posed a flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case