ASMABEN WIFE OF IMRANBHAI AMINBHAI KURESHI vs SAMIR ALIAS SHAMBHO MIRUBHAI SUMRA — 115/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBN010002012026
Filing Number
115/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
115/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Court
DISTICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BHAVNAGAR
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11198015231401
Police Station
BOR TALAV POLICE STATION - BHAVNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASMABEN WIFE OF IMRANBHAI AMINBHAI KURESHI
Adv. B M GAUSWAMI
Respondent(s)
SAMIR ALIAS SHAMBHO MIRUBHAI SUMRA
STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH AGP BHAVNAGAR
Adv. AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 07-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 03-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA/115/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the bail cancellation petition filed against accused Asmaben. Finding no cogent or overwhelming circumstances on record to justify cancellation of previously granted bail, the court held that bail once granted should not be mechanically cancelled without demonstrating supervening events that render it detrimental to fair trial. The court emphasized that personal liberty cannot be jeopardized routinely and noted the state failed to prove the accused misused her liberty or posed a flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA/115/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the bail cancellation petition filed against accused Asmaben. Finding no cogent or overwhelming circumstances on record to justify cancellation of previously granted bail, the court held that bail once granted should not be mechanically cancelled without demonstrating supervening events that render it detrimental to fair trial. The court emphasized that personal liberty cannot be jeopardized routinely and noted the state failed to prove the accused misused her liberty or posed a flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts