Government of Gujarat vs Jitendrabhai @ Atulbhai Rameshbhai Thakor Ranavadiya Advocate - C.P.THAKOR — 12/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,323,294,506(2),114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO
CNR: GJBK180011162018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2018
Filing Date
13-07-2018
Registration No
12/2018
Registration Date
13-07-2018
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
33
Police Station
DEESA NORTH POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. S K JOSHI
Respondent(s)
Jitendrabhai @ Atulbhai Rameshbhai Thakor Ranavadiya Advocate - C.P.THAKOR
Bhemsing @ Bholaji Mohanji Thakor Dabhi
Adv. C.P.THAKOR
Pareshkumar Bharatbhai Thakor Dabhi
Adv. C.P.THAKOR
Rahul @ Valaji Rajuji Yadav Thakor- Khanpura
Adv. C.P.THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 25-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The 6th Sessions Court (Atrocities) at Deesa acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 326, 294(b), 506(2), 114, and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r) and 3(2)(v), finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including unproven discovery panchnama contents, absence of actual caste-based insult language on record, and lack of proof regarding criminal intimidation with intent to cause alarm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The 6th Sessions Court (Atrocities) at Deesa acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 326, 294(b), 506(2), 114, and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r) and 3(2)(v), finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in evidence, including unproven discovery panchnama contents, absence of actual caste-based insult language on record, and lack of proof regarding criminal intimidation with intent to cause alarm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts