RAMILABEN D/O MASAJI THAKOR W/O VIKRAMJI HARPALJI THAKOR vs VIKRAMJI HARPALJI THAKOR Advocate - R K MANSURI — 259/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 17,18,19,20,22,23. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBK160014652024
Filing Number
259/2024
Filing Date
30-Jul-2024
Registration No
259/2024
Registration Date
30-Jul-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHORI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMILABEN D/O MASAJI THAKOR W/O VIKRAMJI HARPALJI THAKOR
Adv. U V BHADREWADIYA
-
2.SIMITSING VIKRAMJI THAKOR
Adv. U V BHADREWADIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIKRAMJI HARPALJI THAKOR Advocate - R K MANSURI
-
2.HARPALJI GAJUJI THAKOR
-
3.JASHIBEN HARPAKJI THAKOR
-
4.VISHNUJI HARPALJI THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The JMFC Shihori court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the applicant (wife) suffered domestic violence from her husband and in-laws, and ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance of ₹3,000 to the applicant and ₹1,000 to their child, plus ₹1,000 for case costs. However, the court rejected claims for compensation, property protection orders, and return of dowry due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-May-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-May-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Mar-2025
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Oct-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Sep-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 259/2024
Court Decision Summary The JMFC Shihori court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the applicant (wife) suffered domestic violence from her husband and in-laws, and ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance of ₹3,000 to the applicant and ₹1,000 to their child, plus ₹1,000 for case costs. However, the court rejected claims for compensation, property protection orders, and return of dowry due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts