RAMILABEN D/O MASAJI THAKOR W/O VIKRAMJI HARPALJI THAKOR vs VIKRAMJI HARPALJI THAKOR Advocate - R K MANSURI — 259/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 17,18,19,20,22,23,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBK160014652024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
259/2024
Filing Date
30-07-2024
Registration No
259/2024
Registration Date
30-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHORI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMILABEN D/O MASAJI THAKOR W/O VIKRAMJI HARPALJI THAKOR
Adv. U V BHADREWADIYA
SIMITSING VIKRAMJI THAKOR
Adv. U V BHADREWADIYA
Respondent(s)
VIKRAMJI HARPALJI THAKOR Advocate - R K MANSURI
HARPALJI GAJUJI THAKOR
JASHIBEN HARPAKJI THAKOR
VISHNUJI HARPALJI THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT | |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT | |
| 24-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT | |
| 19-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The JMFC Shihori court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the applicant (wife) suffered domestic violence from her husband and in-laws, and ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance of ₹3,000 to the applicant and ₹1,000 to their child, plus ₹1,000 for case costs. However, the court rejected claims for compensation, property protection orders, and return of dowry due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The JMFC Shihori court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the applicant (wife) suffered domestic violence from her husband and in-laws, and ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance of ₹3,000 to the applicant and ₹1,000 to their child, plus ₹1,000 for case costs. However, the court rejected claims for compensation, property protection orders, and return of dowry due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts