TRUSTEE OF RAMJI MANDIR 1 KHANDELWAL SURESHKUMAR UKCHAND vs GENERAL MANAGER SHRI THE BANASKANTHA JILLA MADHYASTH BANK LTD Advocate - P D PATEL — 12/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 39,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK130011822023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2023
Filing Date
31-07-2023
Registration No
12/2023
Registration Date
31-07-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TRUSTEE OF RAMJI MANDIR 1 KHANDELWAL SURESHKUMAR UKCHAND
Adv. B R SOLANKI
DEVDA JABBARSINH AMARSINH
Adv. B R SOLANKI
PANCHAL AMRUTBHAI CHAMANLAL
Adv. B R SOLANKI
CHAUDHARY VAGTABHAI RAGNATHBHAI
Adv. B R SOLANKI
TRIVEDI RAMESHBHAI CHENMAL
Adv. B R SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
GENERAL MANAGER SHRI THE BANASKANTHA JILLA MADHYASTH BANK LTD Advocate - P D PATEL
BRANCH MANAGER SHREE THE BDCC BANK LTD PANTHWADA
Adv. P D PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 29-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 24-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: RCS No. 12/2023 | Court: Gujarat High Court, Dantiwada Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition seeking interim relief and a mandatory injunction against the defendant bank. The court rejected all three main issues raised by the plaintiff, finding no merit in the claims regarding property ownership, bank's actions, and potential financial harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: RCS No. 12/2023 | Court: Gujarat High Court, Dantiwada Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition seeking interim relief and a mandatory injunction against the defendant bank. The court rejected all three main issues raised by the plaintiff, finding no merit in the claims regarding property ownership, bank's actions, and potential financial harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts