Government of Gujarat vs MADHUSING RUGSING RATHOD (DARBAR) Advocate - R C MAKWANA — 1165/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(E),116(2),98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK060014182025

Filing Number

1165/2025

Filing Date

13-Oct-2025

Registration No

1165/2025

Registration Date

13-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEODAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195017250807

Police Station

DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(E),116(2),98(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADHUSING RUGSING RATHOD (DARBAR) Advocate - R C MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused (Madhusingh Rugsingh Rathod) in a case under the Prohibition Act Section 65A, 116(2), and 8(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case "beyond reasonable doubt" as five prosecution witnesses declared themselves hostile, crucial scientific evidence reports were missing, and the seizure of the foreign liquor bottle lacked proper corroboration regarding the producer's statement and seal verification, making the conviction legally impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1165/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused (Madhusingh Rugsingh Rathod) in a case under the Prohibition Act Section 65A, 116(2), and 8(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case "beyond reasonable doubt" as five prosecution witnesses declared themselves hostile, crucial scientific evidence reports were missing, and the seizure of the foreign liquor bottle lacked proper corroboration regarding the producer's statement and seal verification, making the conviction legally impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case