Government of Gujarat vs MADHUSING RUGSING RATHOD (DARBAR) Advocate - R C MAKWANA — 1165/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(E),116(2),98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK060014182025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1165/2025
Filing Date
13-10-2025
Registration No
1165/2025
Registration Date
13-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195017250807
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MADHUSING RUGSING RATHOD (DARBAR) Advocate - R C MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Madhusingh Rugsingh Rathod) in a case under the Prohibition Act Section 65A, 116(2), and 8(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case "beyond reasonable doubt" as five prosecution witnesses declared themselves hostile, crucial scientific evidence reports were missing, and the seizure of the foreign liquor bottle lacked proper corroboration regarding the producer's statement and seal verification, making the conviction legally impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Madhusingh Rugsingh Rathod) in a case under the Prohibition Act Section 65A, 116(2), and 8(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case "beyond reasonable doubt" as five prosecution witnesses declared themselves hostile, crucial scientific evidence reports were missing, and the seizure of the foreign liquor bottle lacked proper corroboration regarding the producer's statement and seal verification, making the conviction legally impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts