Government of Gujarat vs JAIBEN W/O JENABHAI THAKOR (SAVASANA) Advocate - B K THAKOR — 175/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-E.F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK060002002026

Filing Number

175/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

175/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEODAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996003251072

Police Station

DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-E.F

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAIBEN W/O JENABHAI THAKOR (SAVASANA) Advocate - B K THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65-E for illicit liquor possession, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court held that while contraband liquor and cash were recovered, critical gaps in the investigation—including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper documentation at the recovery site, and procedural irregularities—rendered the prosecution case inconclusive and failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 175/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65-E for illicit liquor possession, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court held that while contraband liquor and cash were recovered, critical gaps in the investigation—including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper documentation at the recovery site, and procedural irregularities—rendered the prosecution case inconclusive and failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case