Government of Gujarat vs JAIBEN W/O JENABHAI THAKOR (SAVASANA) Advocate - B K THAKOR — 175/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-E.F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK060002002026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
175/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
175/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996003251072
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAIBEN W/O JENABHAI THAKOR (SAVASANA) Advocate - B K THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65-E for illicit liquor possession, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court held that while contraband liquor and cash were recovered, critical gaps in the investigation—including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper documentation at the recovery site, and procedural irregularities—rendered the prosecution case inconclusive and failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65-E for illicit liquor possession, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court held that while contraband liquor and cash were recovered, critical gaps in the investigation—including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper documentation at the recovery site, and procedural irregularities—rendered the prosecution case inconclusive and failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts