Government of Gujarat vs JAIBEN W/O JENABHAI THAKOR (SAVASANA) Advocate - B K THAKOR — 175/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-E.F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK060002002026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

175/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

175/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEODAR

Judge

4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996003251072

Police Station

DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65-E.F

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JAIBEN W/O JENABHAI THAKOR (SAVASANA) Advocate - B K THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

10-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

16-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

23-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65-E for illicit liquor possession, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court held that while contraband liquor and cash were recovered, critical gaps in the investigation—including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper documentation at the recovery site, and procedural irregularities—rendered the prosecution case inconclusive and failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65-E for illicit liquor possession, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court held that while contraband liquor and cash were recovered, critical gaps in the investigation—including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper documentation at the recovery site, and procedural irregularities—rendered the prosecution case inconclusive and failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEODAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case