NANDLAL TRIKAMLAL MAHESHVARI A ONE HOJIYARI PRO. vs KUVARJI AMRUTJI PILUCHIYA Advocate - V V SHAH — 4460/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 04th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK040061092025
Filing Number
4460/2025
Filing Date
30-Oct-2025
Registration No
4460/2025
Registration Date
30-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEESA
Judge
16-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANDLAL TRIKAMLAL MAHESHVARI A ONE HOJIYARI PRO.
Adv. H A SUNDESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.KUVARJI AMRUTJI PILUCHIYA Advocate - V V SHAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court convicted the accused of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of consideration for the cheque and did not provide credible evidence to counter the complainant's prima facie case, resulting in a sentence of one year imprisonment and mandatory payment of the cheque amount as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4460/2025
The court convicted the accused of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of consideration for the cheque and did not provide credible evidence to counter the complainant's prima facie case, resulting in a sentence of one year imprisonment and mandatory payment of the cheque amount as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts