BHARATJI SHANKARJI THAKRADA vs JAYESHBHAI MOTIBHAI SENMA Advocate - R M PARMAR — 614/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK030007222025

Filing Number

614/2025

Filing Date

03-May-2025

Registration No

614/2025

Registration Date

03-May-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARATJI SHANKARJI THAKRADA

    Adv. B K PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYESHBHAI MOTIBHAI SENMA Advocate - R M PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC/614/2025 Petitioner: Bharatji Shankarji Thakrada Respondent: Jayeshbhai Motibhai Senma Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, Vadgam, Banaskantha District, Gujarat Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,90,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused is sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to pay the cheque amount as compensation within one month, or face additional imprisonment. The court rejected the accused's bare denial defense, finding the complainant's evidence of the loan transaction and cheque issuance sufficient to establish the offense under established legal precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 30-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 03-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 614/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC/614/2025 Petitioner: Bharatji Shankarji Thakrada Respondent: Jayeshbhai Motibhai Senma Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, Vadgam, Banaskantha District, Gujarat Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,90,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused is sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to pay the cheque amount as compensation within one month, or face additional imprisonment. The court rejected the accused's bare denial defense, finding the complainant's evidence of the loan transaction and cheque issuance sufficient to establish the offense under established legal precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case