Government of Gujarat vs MAHESHKUMAR RATIPAL YADAV Advocate - J.A.MISTRY — 1723/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 14th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH060020322021
Filing Number
1723/2021
Filing Date
24-Jun-2021
Registration No
1723/2021
Registration Date
24-Jun-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMBUSAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199027210137
Police Station
JAMBUSAR POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESHKUMAR RATIPAL YADAV Advocate - J.A.MISTRY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 1723/2021 - Government of Gujarat v. Maheshkumar Ratipal Yadav The Court acquitted the accused of criminal negligence charges related to a motor vehicle accident under IPC Section 279. Despite evidence of injuries to two victims, the prosecution failed to establish that the accused drove rashly/negligently on a public road endangering life. Critical gaps included: no proof of vehicle specifications, driver identity, or how the accident occurred. Medical evidence showed injuries but lacked causal connection to rash driving. The Court held that mere carelessness or accident occurrence insufficient; criminal rashness/negligence must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Mar-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Feb-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Nov-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Sep-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Jul-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Apr-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Mar-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Jan-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Dec-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Oct-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 1723/2021
Case Summary: 1723/2021 - Government of Gujarat v. Maheshkumar Ratipal Yadav The Court acquitted the accused of criminal negligence charges related to a motor vehicle accident under IPC Section 279. Despite evidence of injuries to two victims, the prosecution failed to establish that the accused drove rashly/negligently on a public road endangering life. Critical gaps included: no proof of vehicle specifications, driver identity, or how the accident occurred. Medical evidence showed injuries but lacked causal connection to rash driving. The Court held that mere carelessness or accident occurrence insufficient; criminal rashness/negligence must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts