ANILBHAI RAMESHBHAI MACHHI vs BIRTH AND DEATH OFFICER SHRI, JAMBUSAR NAGAR PALIKA — 82/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH060009522025
Filing Number
82/2025
Filing Date
30-Jun-2025
Registration No
82/2025
Registration Date
30-Jun-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMBUSAR
Judge
2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANILBHAI RAMESHBHAI MACHHI
Adv. N P PADHIYAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.BIRTH AND DEATH OFFICER SHRI, JAMBUSAR NAGAR PALIKA
-
2.PRINCIPAL SHRI, S.N.I.C. NAGARPALIKA HIGHSCHOOL, JAMBUSAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 82/2025 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner Anilbhai Rameshbhai Machhi's petition and ordered corrections to his birth and school records. The court declared that the petitioner's correct surname is "Machhi" (not "Kikiya"), his mother's correct name is "Shantaben" (not "Shanti"), and his correct caste is "Hindu Machhi" (not "Hindu Kharva"). The Birth Officer was ordered to correct the birth register accordingly, and the School Principal was ordered to issue a corrected School Leaving Certificate with the proper name and caste information. Key Reasoning: The court found that substantial documentary evidence (Aadhar cards, voter IDs, passports) consistently showed the correct names and caste, while the official records contained clerical errors. Under the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1969 Section 15, authorities have wide powers to correct erroneous entries substantive or formal errors—not merely typing mistakes. No administrative circular can override statutory provisions when genuine documentary evidence supports corrections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2026
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 82/2025
Case Summary: RCS 82/2025 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner Anilbhai Rameshbhai Machhi's petition and ordered corrections to his birth and school records. The court declared that the petitioner's correct surname is "Machhi" (not "Kikiya"), his mother's correct name is "Shantaben" (not "Shanti"), and his correct caste is "Hindu Machhi" (not "Hindu Kharva"). The Birth Officer was ordered to correct the birth register accordingly, and the School Principal was ordered to issue a corrected School Leaving Certificate with the proper name and caste information. Key Reasoning: The court found that substantial documentary evidence (Aadhar cards, voter IDs, passports) consistently showed the correct names and caste, while the official records contained clerical errors. Under the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1969 Section 15, authorities have wide powers to correct erroneous entries substantive or formal errors—not merely typing mistakes. No administrative circular can override statutory provisions when genuine documentary evidence supports corrections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts