ANILBHAI RAMESHBHAI MACHHI vs BIRTH AND DEATH OFFICER SHRI, JAMBUSAR NAGAR PALIKA — 82/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH060009522025

Filing Number

82/2025

Filing Date

30-Jun-2025

Registration No

82/2025

Registration Date

30-Jun-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMBUSAR

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANILBHAI RAMESHBHAI MACHHI

    Adv. N P PADHIYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIRTH AND DEATH OFFICER SHRI, JAMBUSAR NAGAR PALIKA

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL SHRI, S.N.I.C. NAGARPALIKA HIGHSCHOOL, JAMBUSAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 82/2025 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner Anilbhai Rameshbhai Machhi's petition and ordered corrections to his birth and school records. The court declared that the petitioner's correct surname is "Machhi" (not "Kikiya"), his mother's correct name is "Shantaben" (not "Shanti"), and his correct caste is "Hindu Machhi" (not "Hindu Kharva"). The Birth Officer was ordered to correct the birth register accordingly, and the School Principal was ordered to issue a corrected School Leaving Certificate with the proper name and caste information. Key Reasoning: The court found that substantial documentary evidence (Aadhar cards, voter IDs, passports) consistently showed the correct names and caste, while the official records contained clerical errors. Under the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1969 Section 15, authorities have wide powers to correct erroneous entries substantive or formal errors—not merely typing mistakes. No administrative circular can override statutory provisions when genuine documentary evidence supports corrections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-May-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 03-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 26-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 04-Oct-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 17-Sep-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 08-Aug-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 17-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 30-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 82/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 82/2025 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner Anilbhai Rameshbhai Machhi's petition and ordered corrections to his birth and school records. The court declared that the petitioner's correct surname is "Machhi" (not "Kikiya"), his mother's correct name is "Shantaben" (not "Shanti"), and his correct caste is "Hindu Machhi" (not "Hindu Kharva"). The Birth Officer was ordered to correct the birth register accordingly, and the School Principal was ordered to issue a corrected School Leaving Certificate with the proper name and caste information. Key Reasoning: The court found that substantial documentary evidence (Aadhar cards, voter IDs, passports) consistently showed the correct names and caste, while the official records contained clerical errors. Under the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1969 Section 15, authorities have wide powers to correct erroneous entries substantive or formal errors—not merely typing mistakes. No administrative circular can override statutory provisions when genuine documentary evidence supports corrections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case