OWNER OF SHRI AST VINAYAK PETROLIAM PRATIK M PATEL vs NARANBHAI BHARVAD SHAKTI ROADLINES PROPWRITER Advocate - J H KADRI — 1304/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH050015222024

Filing Number

1304/2024

Filing Date

21-Jun-2024

Registration No

1304/2024

Registration Date

21-Jun-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OWNER OF SHRI AST VINAYAK PETROLIAM PRATIK M PATEL

    Adv. D G THAKOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARANBHAI BHARVAD SHAKTI ROADLINES PROPWRITER Advocate - J H KADRI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY Case 1304/2024 - Owner of Shri Ast Vinayak Petroleum (Pratik M Patel) v. Naranbhai Bharvad (Shakti Roadlines proprietor) The court acquitted the accused of cheque dishonor charges under Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. The complainant alleged the accused received diesel on credit and issued a check that bounced. However, the court found the check was provided as security for diesel supply, not as payment for existing debt. Since no subsisting liability existed when the check was delivered, Section 138 did not apply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 26-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 29-Aug-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 31-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 16-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 23-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 11-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 06-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 16-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 20-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 21-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1304/2024

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY Case 1304/2024 - Owner of Shri Ast Vinayak Petroleum (Pratik M Patel) v. Naranbhai Bharvad (Shakti Roadlines proprietor) The court acquitted the accused of cheque dishonor charges under Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. The complainant alleged the accused received diesel on credit and issued a check that bounced. However, the court found the check was provided as security for diesel supply, not as payment for existing debt. Since no subsisting liability existed when the check was delivered, Section 138 did not apply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case