DINESHBHAI BHAILAL GULAB vs KANTIBHAI HIRUBHAI Advocate - V.R.PATEL — 50/2014

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,37. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH050000562014

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

50/2014

Filing Date

24-11-2014

Registration No

50/2014

Registration Date

24-11-2014

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA

Judge

1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 31,34,37

Petitioner(s)

DINESHBHAI BHAILAL GULAB

Adv. K.S.MADHIWALA

Respondent(s)

KANTIBHAI HIRUBHAI Advocate - V.R.PATEL

CHIMANBHAI HIRUBHAI

ZULFIKAR AADAMBHAI PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-06-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

26-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

02-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

18-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

06-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

30-12-2015
ORDER

Case Summary: RCS/50/2014 Dineshbhai Bhailal Gulab v. Kantibhai Hirubhai & Others The Principal Civil Court at Vagra decreed the plaintiff's suit for declaration and injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Bersam, Vagra taluka, Bharuch district. The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief application, issuing a mandatory injunction restraining defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of survey numbers 294 and 375. The suit was partially allowed with cost recovery ordered against defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS/50/2014 Dineshbhai Bhailal Gulab v. Kantibhai Hirubhai & Others The Principal Civil Court at Vagra decreed the plaintiff's suit for declaration and injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Bersam, Vagra taluka, Bharuch district. The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief application, issuing a mandatory injunction restraining defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of survey numbers 294 and 375. The suit was partially allowed with cost recovery ordered against defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VAGRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case