DINESHBHAI BHAILAL GULAB vs KANTIBHAI HIRUBHAI Advocate - V.R.PATEL — 50/2014
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,37. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH050000562014
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
50/2014
Filing Date
24-11-2014
Registration No
50/2014
Registration Date
24-11-2014
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGRA
Judge
1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DINESHBHAI BHAILAL GULAB
Adv. K.S.MADHIWALA
Respondent(s)
KANTIBHAI HIRUBHAI Advocate - V.R.PATEL
CHIMANBHAI HIRUBHAI
ZULFIKAR AADAMBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 26-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 18-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS/50/2014 Dineshbhai Bhailal Gulab v. Kantibhai Hirubhai & Others The Principal Civil Court at Vagra decreed the plaintiff's suit for declaration and injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Bersam, Vagra taluka, Bharuch district. The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief application, issuing a mandatory injunction restraining defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of survey numbers 294 and 375. The suit was partially allowed with cost recovery ordered against defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS/50/2014 Dineshbhai Bhailal Gulab v. Kantibhai Hirubhai & Others The Principal Civil Court at Vagra decreed the plaintiff's suit for declaration and injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Bersam, Vagra taluka, Bharuch district. The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief application, issuing a mandatory injunction restraining defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of survey numbers 294 and 375. The suit was partially allowed with cost recovery ordered against defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts