THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LALSINH VAJESINH RATHOD Advocate - P K DESAI — 1178/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060014912025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1178/2025

Filing Date

31-12-2025

Registration No

1178/2025

Registration Date

31-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

50624

Police Station

DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

LALSINH VAJESINH RATHOD Advocate - P K DESAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

15-05-2026

Disposed

06-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

18-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

04-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

SUMMARY OF CASE 1178/2025 The court acquitted respondent Lalsinh Vajesinh Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's case unsupported by independent corroborating evidence. Although police seized illicit liquor (2 liters valued at ₹400) from the accused's residence on 12/09/2025, the panchas (witnesses) who testified failed to meaningfully support the prosecution narrative, and critical procedural requirements—including proper sample collection, FSL analysis, and independent witness corroboration—were not satisfied. The court concluded that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony in prohibition cases where pancha presence is mandatory, and therefore set aside the conviction while imposing a nominal fine of ₹5,000 with property forfeiture as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY OF CASE 1178/2025 The court acquitted respondent Lalsinh Vajesinh Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's case unsupported by independent corroborating evidence. Although police seized illicit liquor (2 liters valued at ₹400) from the accused's residence on 12/09/2025, the panchas (witnesses) who testified failed to meaningfully support the prosecution narrative, and critical procedural requirements—including proper sample collection, FSL analysis, and independent witness corroboration—were not satisfied. The court concluded that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony in prohibition cases where pancha presence is mandatory, and therefore set aside the conviction while imposing a nominal fine of ₹5,000 with property forfeiture as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case