THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LALSINH VAJESINH RATHOD Advocate - P K DESAI — 1178/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060014912025
Filing Number
1178/2025
Filing Date
31-12-2025
Registration No
1178/2025
Registration Date
31-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
50624
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LALSINH VAJESINH RATHOD Advocate - P K DESAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY OF CASE 1178/2025 The court acquitted respondent Lalsinh Vajesinh Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's case unsupported by independent corroborating evidence. Although police seized illicit liquor (2 liters valued at ₹400) from the accused's residence on 12/09/2025, the panchas (witnesses) who testified failed to meaningfully support the prosecution narrative, and critical procedural requirements—including proper sample collection, FSL analysis, and independent witness corroboration—were not satisfied. The court concluded that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony in prohibition cases where pancha presence is mandatory, and therefore set aside the conviction while imposing a nominal fine of ₹5,000 with property forfeiture as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY OF CASE 1178/2025 The court acquitted respondent Lalsinh Vajesinh Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's case unsupported by independent corroborating evidence. Although police seized illicit liquor (2 liters valued at ₹400) from the accused's residence on 12/09/2025, the panchas (witnesses) who testified failed to meaningfully support the prosecution narrative, and critical procedural requirements—including proper sample collection, FSL analysis, and independent witness corroboration—were not satisfied. The court concluded that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony in prohibition cases where pancha presence is mandatory, and therefore set aside the conviction while imposing a nominal fine of ₹5,000 with property forfeiture as ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts