THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MINABEN BHALAJI KHANT Advocate - V I BHARVAD — 34/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060000402026
Filing Number
34/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
50850
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MINABEN BHALAJI KHANT Advocate - V I BHARVAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Minaben Bhalaji Khant (CC 34/2026) The court acquitted the accused of prohibited liquor possession charges, finding critical evidentiary gaps in the prosecution's case. The independent panch witnesses who were present during the alleged seizure failed to corroborate the police's version, and the seized liquor sample was not properly sent for forensic analysis as mandated by the 2012 Rules, undermining the chain of custody and making conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Minaben Bhalaji Khant (CC 34/2026) The court acquitted the accused of prohibited liquor possession charges, finding critical evidentiary gaps in the prosecution's case. The independent panch witnesses who were present during the alleged seizure failed to corroborate the police's version, and the seized liquor sample was not properly sent for forensic analysis as mandated by the 2012 Rules, undermining the chain of custody and making conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts