THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HARSHADBHAI MANHARBHAI PATEL Advocate - J S PATEL — 219/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(3),296(KH),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR050002552025

Filing Number

219/2025

Filing Date

26-Mar-2025

Registration No

219/2025

Registration Date

26-Mar-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MALPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11188006250184

Police Station

MALPUR POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(3),296(KH),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARSHADBHAI MANHARBHAI PATEL Advocate - J S PATEL

  2. 2.MAMTABEN W/O HARSHADBHAI MANHARBHAI PATEL

  3. 3.USHABEN W/O MANHARBHAI MADHABHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Harshadbhai Manharbhai Patel (2025) Court Decision: The Malpur First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all three accused under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 289(b), and 54, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused abused the complainant or committed the alleged acts of violence. Key Reasoning: After examining all oral and documentary evidence, the court determined the accused's statements denying the charges were credible, while the prosecution's case lacked corroborating evidence. The court applied the principle that the burden rests on the prosecution to prove guilt conclusively, which it failed to discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 13-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 22-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 26-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 219/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Harshadbhai Manharbhai Patel (2025) Court Decision: The Malpur First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all three accused under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 289(b), and 54, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused abused the complainant or committed the alleged acts of violence. Key Reasoning: After examining all oral and documentary evidence, the court determined the accused's statements denying the charges were credible, while the prosecution's case lacked corroborating evidence. The court applied the principle that the burden rests on the prosecution to prove guilt conclusively, which it failed to discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case