AYUBBHAI AHEMADBHAI KUSHKIVALA vs JASHUBHAI SOMABHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - L I ZALA — 395/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 04th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR040005012025
Filing Number
395/2025
Filing Date
05-Jun-2025
Registration No
395/2025
Registration Date
05-Jun-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AYUBBHAI AHEMADBHAI KUSHKIVALA
Adv. K J PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.JASHUBHAI SOMABHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - L I ZALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹83,000. The complainant provided goods on credit and received a post-dated cheque as payment, which bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite legal notice, the accused failed to make payment, establishing guilt under statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2026
Order
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2026
Order
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 395/2025
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹83,000. The complainant provided goods on credit and received a post-dated cheque as payment, which bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite legal notice, the accused failed to make payment, establishing guilt under statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts