GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SHANKARBHAI MARTABHAI DEDUN Advocate - A D NINAMA — 291/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR040003102023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
291/2023
Filing Date
31-01-2023
Registration No
291/2023
Registration Date
31-01-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ
Judge
1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
111880052100029
Police Station
ISRI POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHANKARBHAI MARTABHAI DEDUN Advocate - A D NINAMA
GOVINDBHAI MARATABHAI DEDUN
PUSHPABEN W/O SHAKARBHAI DEDUN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 03-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Shankarbhai, Govind bhai, and Pushpaben Dedunn) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), 114, and GP Act Section 135. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations "beyond reasonable doubt"—the complainant's testimony lacked corroborating evidence, no medical or documentary proof substantiated claims of assault or threats, and no weapon was recovered. Without sufficient evidence, the court discharged the accused with bail terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Shankarbhai, Govind bhai, and Pushpaben Dedunn) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), 114, and GP Act Section 135. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations "beyond reasonable doubt"—the complainant's testimony lacked corroborating evidence, no medical or documentary proof substantiated claims of assault or threats, and no weapon was recovered. Without sufficient evidence, the court discharged the accused with bail terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts