GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SHANKARBHAI MARTABHAI DEDUN Advocate - A D NINAMA — 291/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040003102023

Filing Number

291/2023

Filing Date

31-Jan-2023

Registration No

291/2023

Registration Date

31-Jan-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

111880052100029

Police Station

ISRI POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANKARBHAI MARTABHAI DEDUN Advocate - A D NINAMA

  2. 2.GOVINDBHAI MARATABHAI DEDUN

  3. 3.PUSHPABEN W/O SHAKARBHAI DEDUN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Shankarbhai, Govind bhai, and Pushpaben Dedunn) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), 114, and GP Act Section 135. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations "beyond reasonable doubt"—the complainant's testimony lacked corroborating evidence, no medical or documentary proof substantiated claims of assault or threats, and no weapon was recovered. Without sufficient evidence, the court discharged the accused with bail terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 15-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 25-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 21-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 16-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 11-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 21-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 05-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 14-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 04-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 04-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 09-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 16-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 11-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 05-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 20-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 31-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 12-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 27-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 31-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 291/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Shankarbhai, Govind bhai, and Pushpaben Dedunn) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), 114, and GP Act Section 135. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations "beyond reasonable doubt"—the complainant's testimony lacked corroborating evidence, no medical or documentary proof substantiated claims of assault or threats, and no weapon was recovered. Without sufficient evidence, the court discharged the accused with bail terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case