TARAR LALJIBHAI PUNAJI vs PAGI DAHYABHAI SHAMALABHAI Advocate - V K MOTHALIYA — 67/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 16-Jul-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJAR030016342024

Filing Number

67/2024

Filing Date

16-Oct-2024

Registration No

67/2024

Registration Date

16-Oct-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TARAR LALJIBHAI PUNAJI

    Adv. S A PATEL

  2. 2.TARAR MALAJI PUNAJI

  3. 3.TARAR POPATBHAI MAGANBHAI

  4. 4.TARAE SANTABEN MAGANBHAI

  5. 5.TARAR RAMILABEN GIRADHRBHAI

  6. 6.TARAR VIPULKUMAR GIRADHRBHAI

  7. 7.TARAR SAILESHBHAI GIRADHRBHAI

  8. 8.TARAR KHEMIBEN DHULABHAI

  9. 9.TARAR SARJANBHAI DHULABHAI

  10. 10.TARAR JASHIBEN DHULABHAI

  11. 11.TARAR KAILASHBEN DHULABHAI

  12. 12.TARAR LAKHUBEN DHULABHAI

  13. 13.TARAR HANSABEN DHULABHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAGI DAHYABHAI SHAMALABHAI Advocate - V K MOTHALIYA

  2. 2.PAGI KANJIBHAI DAHYABHAI

    Adv. V K MOTHALIYA

  3. 3.PAGI NATUBHAI DAHYABHAI

    Adv. V K MOTHALIYA

  4. 4.PAGI DHIRABHAI SADABHAI

    Adv. V K MOTHALIYA

  5. 5.PAGI KAMLESHBHAI DHIRABHAI

    Adv. V K MOTHALIYA

  6. 6.PAGI NATHABHAI SHAMALBHAI

    Adv. V K MOTHALIYA

  7. 7.PAGI VIKRAMBHAI NATHABHAI

    Adv. V K MOTHALIYA

  8. 8.MAKWANA SOMAJI SONAJI

    Adv. V K MOTHALIYA

  9. 9.MAKWANA BALABHAI SONAJI

    Adv. V K MOTHALIYA

  10. 10.MAKAVANA PRBHUBHAI KODARBHAI

    Adv. V K MOTHALIYA

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: RCS No. 67/2024 The court dismissed applications for temporary injunction filed by both petitioners and respondents under CPC Order 39, Rules 1-2 and Section 151. The case involves a property dispute in Vajpur, Tilaoda, Aravalli district. Petitioners claimed inherited rights to ancestral land and sought to restrain respondents from interfering with their possession and harvesting rights. Respondents filed counter-applications contesting the petitioners' claims. After examining pleadings, evidence, and applying established legal principles regarding injunctions (prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience), the court found neither party established a sufficiently strong case for temporary relief, with disputed ownership and possession matters requiring full trial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Mar-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 26-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 19-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 10-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 27-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 21-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 06-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 09-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 25-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 12-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 07-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 17-Jul-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 08-Jul-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 20-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 13-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 01-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 07-Apr-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 07-Mar-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 31-Jan-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 02-Jan-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 09-Dec-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 18-Nov-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 16-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 16-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2024

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: RCS No. 67/2024 The court dismissed applications for temporary injunction filed by both petitioners and respondents under CPC Order 39, Rules 1-2 and Section 151. The case involves a property dispute in Vajpur, Tilaoda, Aravalli district. Petitioners claimed inherited rights to ancestral land and sought to restrain respondents from interfering with their possession and harvesting rights. Respondents filed counter-applications contesting the petitioners' claims. After examining pleadings, evidence, and applying established legal principles regarding injunctions (prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience), the court found neither party established a sufficiently strong case for temporary relief, with disputed ownership and possession matters requiring full trial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case