MANSURI JAKIRHUSEN NURMAHAMAD vs DHARMESH RAMAKANT PANDYA Advocate - J D PARMAR — 1213/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR030015622023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1213/2023
Filing Date
12-09-2023
Registration No
1213/2023
Registration Date
12-09-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHILODA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANSURI JAKIRHUSEN NURMAHAMAD
Adv. A P MANSURI
Respondent(s)
DHARMESH RAMAKANT PANDYA Advocate - J D PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 28-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth Rs. 1,00,000. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for discharging a debt/liability, despite being given opportunity to present defense. The court sentenced the accused to 3 months simple imprisonment and imposed fine of Rs. 5,000, with additional compensation of Rs. 46,500 to be paid within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth Rs. 1,00,000. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for discharging a debt/liability, despite being given opportunity to present defense. The court sentenced the accused to 3 months simple imprisonment and imposed fine of Rs. 5,000, with additional compensation of Rs. 46,500 to be paid within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts