RATILAL POPATLAL GANDHI(Legal Heir) vs GANDHI DALSUKHDAS POPATLAL Advocate - P S PAGI — 23/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU

CNR: GJAR030013902025

Filing Number

23/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RATILAL POPATLAL GANDHI(Legal Heir)

    Adv. B P PATEL1.

  2. 2.MINABEN RATILAL GANDHI 1.

  3. 3.GANDHI ANILABEN RATILAL 1.

  4. 4.GANDHI NITINKUMAR RATILAL 1.

  5. 5.GANDHI SANJAYKUMAR RATILAL 1.

  6. 6.GANDHI JAYABEN RATILAL

  7. 7.BABUBEN POPATLAL GHANDHI(Legal Heir) 2.

  8. 8.RAMESH CHANDULAL MODI 2.

  9. 9.KANUBHAI CHANDUBHAI MODI

  10. 10.MADHUBEN SAKALCHAND VORA(Legal Heir) 3.

  11. 11.RAMESHBHAI SHAKALCHAND VORA 3.

  12. 12.ASHOKKUMAR SHAKALCHAND VORA

  13. 13.KAMALABEN POPATLAL GANDHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GANDHI DALSUKHDAS POPATLAL Advocate - P S PAGI

  2. 2.JADEJA RAJENDRSINH SURAJMALSINH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Gujarat High Court rejected the petitioner's application seeking condonation of delay (9 years, 9 months, and 15 days) in filing a restoration application for a suit dismissed in 2015. The court found that the petitioner failed to disclose the source and date of knowledge of dismissal, showed persistent non-prosecution despite service of notices, and provided only unsubstantiated blame on counsel without taking prompt remedial action—factors that did not constitute sufficient cause for delay under the Limitation Act's Section 5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 01-Jan-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 04-Nov-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 06-Oct-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 29-Sep-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 22-Aug-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 30-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court rejected the petitioner's application seeking condonation of delay (9 years, 9 months, and 15 days) in filing a restoration application for a suit dismissed in 2015. The court found that the petitioner failed to disclose the source and date of knowledge of dismissal, showed persistent non-prosecution despite service of notices, and provided only unsubstantiated blame on counsel without taking prompt remedial action—factors that did not constitute sufficient cause for delay under the Limitation Act's Section 5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case