Khokhar Kasamkhan Gulabkhan(Legal Heir) vs Khokhar Sakinabibi Abbaskhan Sardarkhan Advocate - V.B.BHARWAD — 87/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 009. Status: DEFENDANTS EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAR020000982008
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
Filing Number
87/2008
Filing Date
08-08-2008
Registration No
87/2008
Registration Date
08-08-2008
Court
CIVIL COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Khokhar Kasamkhan Gulabkhan(Legal Heir)
Adv. G.M.PATEL1.
SAYADABANU KASAMKHAN KHOKHAR
Adv. G.M.PATEL
Khokhar Yasinkhan Dilavarkhan(Legal Heir)
Adv. G.M.PATEL2.
KHOKHAR ITMABIBI YASINKHA(Legal Heir)
Adv. G.M.PATEL2.
KHOKHAR JNABBIBI YASINKHA
Adv. G.M.PATEL2.
KHOKHAR MAKBULHUSEN YASINKHA
Adv. G.M.PATEL2.
KHOKHAR LIYAKTHUSEN YASINKHA
Adv. G.M.PATEL2.
KHOKHAR MAHMADILIYAS YASINKHA
Adv. G.M.PATEL
Khokhar Rukaiyabanu Zafarhusian
Adv. G.M.PATEL
Khokhar Firozkhan Zafarhusain
Adv. G.M.PATEL
Khokhar Parvezkhan Zafarhusainkhan
Adv. G.M.PATEL
Khokhar Rahiskhan Zafarhusainkhan
Adv. G.M.PATEL
Respondent(s)
Khokhar Sakinabibi Abbaskhan Sardarkhan Advocate - V.B.BHARWAD
Khokhar Mahmadsalim Nasibkhan
Adv. V.B.BHARWAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
DEFENDANTS EVIDENCE
DEFENDANTS EVIDENCE
DEFENDANTS EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | DEFENDANTS EVIDENCE |
| 09-04-2026 | DEFENDANTS EVIDENCE |
| 07-04-2026 | DEFENDANTS EVIDENCE |
| 30-03-2026 | PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE |
| 10-03-2026 | PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The plaintiff's application for stay of suit is allowed. The court stayed the civil suit and referred the issue to the Mamlatdar of Modasa to determine whether defendants 4, 6, and 8 are farmers entitled to hold agricultural land under the Tenancy Act, and whether the disputed property is cultivable or non-cultivable. The Mamlatdar must file a report with the court after making these determinations, following which the civil court will proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The plaintiff's application for stay of suit is allowed. The court stayed the civil suit and referred the issue to the Mamlatdar of Modasa to determine whether defendants 4, 6, and 8 are farmers entitled to hold agricultural land under the Tenancy Act, and whether the disputed property is cultivable or non-cultivable. The Mamlatdar must file a report with the court after making these determinations, following which the civil court will proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts