THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SACHINKUMAR KANUSINH KALUSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - K K VANKAR — 59/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64(1),65(1),75(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd May 2026.

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJAR010023002025

Case disposed

Filing Number

59/2025

Filing Date

12-09-2025

Registration No

59/2025

Registration Date

12-09-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA

Judge

1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

533

Police Station

MODASA RURAL POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 64(1),65(1),75(2),351(3)
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 4,8,12

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. D S PATEL

Respondent(s)

SACHINKUMAR KANUSINH KALUSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - K K VANKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

02-05-2026

Disposed

01-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

10-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

CASE SUMMARY: POCSO Case No. 59/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Sachinkumar Kanusinh Kalusinh Chauhan, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 65(1), 75(2), 351(3) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 8, 12. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident, and consequently could not establish the substantive offences charged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: POCSO Case No. 59/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Sachinkumar Kanusinh Kalusinh Chauhan, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 65(1), 75(2), 351(3) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 8, 12. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident, and consequently could not establish the substantive offences charged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case