THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SACHINKUMAR KANUSINH KALUSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - K K VANKAR — 59/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64(1),65(1),75(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd May 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJAR010023002025
Filing Number
59/2025
Filing Date
12-09-2025
Registration No
59/2025
Registration Date
12-09-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
533
Police Station
MODASA RURAL POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. D S PATEL
Respondent(s)
SACHINKUMAR KANUSINH KALUSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - K K VANKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 10-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 27-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: POCSO Case No. 59/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Sachinkumar Kanusinh Kalusinh Chauhan, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 65(1), 75(2), 351(3) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 8, 12. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident, and consequently could not establish the substantive offences charged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: POCSO Case No. 59/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Sachinkumar Kanusinh Kalusinh Chauhan, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 65(1), 75(2), 351(3) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 8, 12. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident, and consequently could not establish the substantive offences charged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts