Government of Gujarat vs MAHAMMADARIF URFE LALBAS S/O SALIMMIYA KURESHI — 228/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116(B),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAN030003142026

Filing Number

228/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

228/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PETLAD

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11215021250503

Police Station

PETLAD TOWN POLICE STATION - ANAND DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116(B),81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHAMMADARIF URFE LALBAS S/O SALIMMIYA KURESHI

  2. 2.MOHASINMIYA S/O LIYAKATMIYA URFE L K MALEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C.NO. 228/2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), 116(b), and 81 IPC. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt regarding alleged illegal possession and sale of foreign liquor (Royal Stage Premier Whisky). Key Reasoning: While seizure of liquor occurred on 24/09/2025, the court found insufficient corroborating evidence from the five key witnesses. Critical prosecution witnesses failed to provide substantive testimony beyond identifying their own signatures on documents. Applying fundamental criminal jurisprudence principles—that the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the accused enjoys presumption of innocence—the court determined the evidence lacked necessary certainty for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  4. 27-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  5. 26-May-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  6. 22-May-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  7. 22-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.NO. 228/2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), 116(b), and 81 IPC. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt regarding alleged illegal possession and sale of foreign liquor (Royal Stage Premier Whisky). Key Reasoning: While seizure of liquor occurred on 24/09/2025, the court found insufficient corroborating evidence from the five key witnesses. Critical prosecution witnesses failed to provide substantive testimony beyond identifying their own signatures on documents. Applying fundamental criminal jurisprudence principles—that the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the accused enjoys presumption of innocence—the court determined the evidence lacked necessary certainty for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case