Government of Gujarat vs KALUBHAI BHANABHAI MALNIYA Advocate - P N MAKWANA — 751/2024
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAM030012422024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
751/2024
Filing Date
22-10-2024
Registration No
751/2024
Registration Date
22-10-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHARI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11193018240307
Police Station
DHARI POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KALUBHAI BHANABHAI MALNIYA Advocate - P N MAKWANA
MAHESHBHAI MADHUBHAI MALNIYA
FATEMAHMADBHAI JAMALBHAI BLOS
SANJAYBHAI DHANJIBHAI KUDECHA
KANUBHAI LALJIBHAI CHUDASAMA
VIJAYBHAI DHIRUBHAI SUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 12-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 15-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted all six accused in a Gambling Act case (C.C. 751-2024) for lack of sufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the gambling charges under the Gambling Act Section 12 because critical evidence—including independent witness statements, proper FIR details, and procedural documentation—was absent or inadequately recorded in the investigation file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted all six accused in a Gambling Act case (C.C. 751-2024) for lack of sufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the gambling charges under the Gambling Act Section 12 because critical evidence—including independent witness statements, proper FIR details, and procedural documentation—was absent or inadequately recorded in the investigation file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts