Government of Gujarat vs KALUBHAI BHANABHAI MALNIYA Advocate - P N MAKWANA — 751/2024

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAM030012422024

Filing Number

751/2024

Filing Date

22-Oct-2024

Registration No

751/2024

Registration Date

22-Oct-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHARI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11193018240307

Police Station

DHARI POLICE STATION - AMRELI DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALUBHAI BHANABHAI MALNIYA Advocate - P N MAKWANA

  2. 2.MAHESHBHAI MADHUBHAI MALNIYA

  3. 3.FATEMAHMADBHAI JAMALBHAI BLOS

  4. 4.SANJAYBHAI DHANJIBHAI KUDECHA

  5. 5.KANUBHAI LALJIBHAI CHUDASAMA

  6. 6.VIJAYBHAI DHIRUBHAI SUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted all six accused in a Gambling Act case (C.C. 751-2024) for lack of sufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the gambling charges under the Gambling Act Section 12 because critical evidence—including independent witness statements, proper FIR details, and procedural documentation—was absent or inadequately recorded in the investigation file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 30-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 21-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 25-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 22-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 751/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted all six accused in a Gambling Act case (C.C. 751-2024) for lack of sufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the gambling charges under the Gambling Act Section 12 because critical evidence—including independent witness statements, proper FIR details, and procedural documentation—was absent or inadequately recorded in the investigation file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case