P J CREDIT CAPITAL PVT LTD vs SAGAR PREMJIBHAI DHADHAL Advocate - D R SHREEMALI — 5475/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

eCC - eCRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH280062282025

e-Filing Number

15-05-2025

Filing Number

4933/2025

Filing Date

15-May-2025

Registration No

5475/2025

Registration Date

15-May-2025

Court

SARAS N.I. Courts, CJM, Ahmedabad City

Judge

1-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P J CREDIT CAPITAL PVT LTD

    Adv. MR PARMAR JIGARKUMAR ISHWARBHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAGAR PREMJIBHAI DHADHAL Advocate - D R SHREEMALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court convicted Sagar Premjibhai Dhadhal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 77,558 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused had taken a personal loan from PJ Credit Capital Pvt Ltd and failed to repay the installments, later issuing the dishonored cheque. The court found that the complainant successfully proved all essential elements of the offense—including the cheque's return with "Funds Insufficient" status and the accused's failure to make payment despite receiving a statutory notice. The accused presented no credible defense and remained silent against the demand notice, leading to his conviction and sentencing to 2 years simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1,55,116. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  7. 20-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  11. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  12. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  13. 20-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  14. 06-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  15. 11-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  16. 17-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saras N.I. Court No. 1. CJM Courts, Ahmedabad City

  17. 20-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 15-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5475/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted Sagar Premjibhai Dhadhal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 77,558 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused had taken a personal loan from PJ Credit Capital Pvt Ltd and failed to repay the installments, later issuing the dishonored cheque. The court found that the complainant successfully proved all essential elements of the offense—including the cheque's return with "Funds Insufficient" status and the accused's failure to make payment despite receiving a statutory notice. The accused presented no credible defense and remained silent against the demand notice, leading to his conviction and sentencing to 2 years simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1,55,116. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case