SHANTUBEN W/O HARIBHAI CHIKABHAI NAT vs TEJASINGH AMARSINGH YADAV(Dead) — 863/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJAH240030782021

Filing Number

863/2021

Filing Date

21-Oct-2019

Registration No

863/2021

Registration Date

21-Oct-2019

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

2-8th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANTUBEN W/O HARIBHAI CHIKABHAI NAT

    Adv. D S PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TEJASINGH AMARSINGH YADAV(Dead)

  2. 2.SUNITADEVI TEJASINGH YADAV

  3. 3.DHARAMPAL BHOLARAM

  4. 4.THE NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

    Adv. F S BHATT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal of Dholka, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) partially allowed the compensation claim of the claimant (sister of the deceased). The court awarded Rs. 5,78,000 to the claimant, comprising loss of dependency (Rs. 5,04,000), loss of estate (Rs. 15,000), funeral expenses (Rs. 15,000), and filial consortium (Rs. 44,000), payable by the vehicle owner and insurance company jointly and severally with 9% annual interest from the filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    8th Addl District Judge

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    8th Addl District Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    8th Addl District Judge

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    8th Addl District Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    8th Addl District Judge

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    9th Addl District Judge

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    9th Addl District Judge

  14. 13-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    9th Addl District Judge

  15. 06-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    9th Addl District Judge

  16. 09-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    9th Addl District Judge

  17. 17-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    9th Addl District Judge

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    9th Addl District Judge

  19. 30-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    9th Addl District Judge

  20. 05-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    9th Addl District Judge

  21. 04-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    9th Addl District Judge

  22. 21-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    9th Addl District Judge

  23. 03-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  24. 05-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  25. 08-Mar-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  26. 01-Mar-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  27. 01-Feb-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  28. 10-Jan-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  29. 20-Dec-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  30. 18-Dec-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  31. 20-Nov-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  32. 28-Oct-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  33. 21-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  34. 17-Sep-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  35. 29-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  36. 16-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  37. 03-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  38. 24-Jun-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    10th Addl District Judge

  39. 07-Jun-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    11th Addl District Judge

  40. 19-Apr-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  41. 02-Mar-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  42. 19-Jan-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  43. 08-Dec-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  44. 20-Oct-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  45. 06-Oct-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  46. 01-Sep-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  47. 26-Jul-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  48. 16-Jun-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  49. 28-Apr-2023

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  50. 21-Apr-2023

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  51. 24-Mar-2023

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  52. 17-Mar-2023

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  53. 14-Feb-2023

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  54. 10-Feb-2023

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  55. 19-Jan-2023

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  56. 16-Dec-2022

    Summons - Notice

    7th Addl District Judge

  57. 21-Nov-2022

    Summons - Notice

    7th Addl District Judge

  58. 30-Sep-2022

    Summons - Notice

    7th Addl District Judge

  59. 25-Aug-2022

    Summons - Notice

    7th Addl District Judge

  60. 27-Jun-2022

    Summons - Notice

    7th Addl District Judge

  61. 05-May-2022

    Summons - Notice

    9th Addl District Judge

  62. 02-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 21-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 863/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal of Dholka, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) partially allowed the compensation claim of the claimant (sister of the deceased). The court awarded Rs. 5,78,000 to the claimant, comprising loss of dependency (Rs. 5,04,000), loss of estate (Rs. 15,000), funeral expenses (Rs. 15,000), and filial consortium (Rs. 44,000), payable by the vehicle owner and insurance company jointly and severally with 9% annual interest from the filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case