THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VIKRAMBHAI ABHABHAI MER Advocate - N M KHASIYA — 151/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118(1),115(2),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH230002242025
Filing Number
151/2025
Filing Date
11-06-2025
Registration No
151/2025
Registration Date
11-06-2025
Court
Taluka Court, Dholera
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192019250050
Police Station
DHOLERA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VIKRAMBHAI ABHABHAI MER Advocate - N M KHASIYA
MUNNABHAI ABHABHAI MER
Adv. N M KHASIYA
BHAVESHBHAI ABHABHAI MER
Adv. N M KHASIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Dholera Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted three accused (Vikrambhai, Munnabhai, and Bhaveshbhai Mer) in Criminal Case No. 151/2025 dated 15/04/2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges under BNS sections 118(1), 119(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and GP Act section 135. The prosecution failed to establish a direct, unbroken chain connecting the accused to the alleged assault and threats despite witness testimonies, as no corroborating documentary evidence supported the complainant's version of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Dholera Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted three accused (Vikrambhai, Munnabhai, and Bhaveshbhai Mer) in Criminal Case No. 151/2025 dated 15/04/2026, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges under BNS sections 118(1), 119(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and GP Act section 135. The prosecution failed to establish a direct, unbroken chain connecting the accused to the alleged assault and threats despite witness testimonies, as no corroborating documentary evidence supported the complainant's version of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts